+16.9%
CNC vs KRMN
+17.6%
-0.7%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.6% | -1.0% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -11.8% | +10.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -1.0% | -43.0% | +42.0% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -28.8% | +33.4% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +85.2% | -66.3% | +151.6% | +91.1% |
| YTD | +61.4% | -51.8% | +113.2% | +63.8% |
| 1Y | +94.9% | -44.7% | +139.6% | +95.7% |
| All | +16.9% | +17.6% | -0.7% | +12.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling