-2.6%
CNC vs HTZ
-81.9%
+79.3%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -6.1% | +5.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -14.0% | +8.7% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -19.8% | +21.8% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -45.0% | +49.8% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +18.5% | -73.2% | +91.7% | +23.7% |
| YTD | +70.8% | -70.0% | +140.8% | +76.3% |
| 1Y | +94.1% | -75.7% | +169.8% | +101.8% |
| All | -2.6% | -81.9% | +79.3% | +0.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling