+8.3%
CNC vs GLDM
+128.8%
-120.4%
-68.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.5% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -0.5% | +4.1% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +0.1% | +4.4% | -4.3% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +6.9% | -1.1% | +8.0% | +6.6% |
| 6M | +49.0% | -13.7% | +62.7% | +47.6% |
| YTD | +62.9% | +2.8% | +60.2% | +64.0% |
| 1Y | +134.0% | +24.8% | +109.1% | +140.2% |
| All | +8.3% | +128.8% | -120.4% | +8.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling