+31.7%
CMS vs UMAC
+549.5%
-517.8%
-13.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +9.3% | -8.9% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +14.7% | -13.5% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -0.5% | -2.7% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -2.2% | +0.5% | -2.7% | -2.1% |
| 6M | -9.4% | +57.9% | -67.4% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +0.7% | +103.9% | -103.2% | +0.5% |
| 1Y | +0.4% | +159.3% | -158.9% | +0.1% |
| All | +31.7% | +549.5% | -517.8% | +29.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling