+37.3%
CMS vs PENG
+101.4%
-64.1%
-13.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +6.4% | -6.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.4% | +4.5% | -4.2% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -3.6% | -7.1% | +3.5% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -27.3% | +25.3% | -2.1% |
| 6M | -11.0% | +169.6% | -180.6% | -9.4% |
| YTD | +0.2% | +164.6% | -164.4% | +1.9% |
| 1Y | -1.3% | +109.5% | -110.8% | +0.1% |
| All | +37.3% | +101.4% | -64.1% | +36.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling