+36.9%
CMS vs LNT
+57.3%
-20.4%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -1.0% | -1.1% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +1.4% | -2.7% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +6.3% | +12.3% | -6.0% | -3.1% |
| 3M | -2.1% | +5.3% | -7.4% | -6.1% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +2.0% | -7.1% | -6.7% |
| YTD | +1.3% | +15.3% | -14.0% | -9.5% |
| 1Y | -1.4% | +12.3% | -13.7% | -10.0% |
| 3Y | +36.9% | +59.1% | -22.2% | -5.8% |
| All | +36.9% | +57.3% | -20.4% | -5.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling