+35.2%
CMS vs LH
+64.5%
-29.3%
-13.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.6% | +1.1% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -0.8% | +2.1% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -3.2% | +2.0% | -5.2% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -2.2% | +24.3% | -26.5% | -7.9% |
| 6M | -9.4% | +21.1% | -30.5% | -14.2% |
| YTD | +0.7% | +30.4% | -29.8% | -6.7% |
| 1Y | +0.4% | +18.4% | -18.0% | -4.7% |
| 3Y | +35.2% | +65.5% | -30.3% | +13.2% |
| All | +35.2% | +64.5% | -29.3% | +13.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling