+32.6%
CMS vs FLNC
-63.7%
+96.3%
-14.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -4.2% | +3.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -5.0% | +3.7% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -2.8% | -26.1% | +23.3% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -55.2% | +48.1% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -10.0% | -42.6% | +32.6% | -10.4% |
| YTD | -0.9% | -51.0% | +50.1% | -1.5% |
| 1Y | -2.0% | +43.3% | -45.3% | -4.3% |
| All | +32.6% | -63.7% | +96.3% | +30.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling