+39.8%
CMS vs ENPH
-66.2%
+106.1%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -2.7% | +4.3% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -8.4% | +10.2% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +6.2% | -11.2% | +17.4% | +6.4% |
| 3M | +0.6% | -36.1% | +36.7% | +1.4% |
| 6M | -1.8% | -37.9% | +36.2% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +3.8% | -18.7% | +22.5% | +2.5% |
| 1Y | -1.8% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -3.6% |
| 3Y | +39.8% | -66.8% | +106.6% | +35.2% |
| All | +39.8% | -66.2% | +106.1% | +35.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling