+36.9%
CMS vs EMB
+28.2%
+8.7%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | 0.0% | -2.1% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.1% | -1.2% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +6.3% | +1.3% | +5.0% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -2.1% | -2.7% | +0.7% | -0.2% |
| 6M | -5.1% | -2.8% | -2.3% | -3.2% |
| YTD | +1.3% | -1.1% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| 1Y | -1.4% | 0.0% | -1.4% | -1.6% |
| 3Y | +36.9% | +28.8% | +8.1% | +9.6% |
| All | +36.9% | +28.2% | +8.7% | +9.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling