+39.6%
CMS vs ACM
-7.9%
+47.5%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +5.2% | -4.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.9% | +6.9% | -7.8% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +7.1% | +19.1% | -12.0% | +5.7% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -6.9% | +5.7% | -1.0% |
| 6M | -2.7% | -12.0% | +9.4% | -2.0% |
| YTD | +2.6% | -25.1% | +27.8% | +4.6% |
| 1Y | -2.0% | -45.4% | +43.4% | +3.7% |
| 3Y | +39.6% | -6.9% | +46.5% | +27.3% |
| All | +39.6% | -7.9% | +47.5% | +27.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling