+37.9%
CMS vs ABCL
+206.1%
-168.2%
-20.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.3% | +0.7% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +0.5% | +2.3% | -1.8% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +7.4% | -0.7% | +8.1% | +7.5% |
| 3M | +1.9% | +33.4% | -31.5% | +1.9% |
| 6M | -2.3% | +137.8% | -140.1% | -2.4% |
| YTD | +3.0% | +264.3% | -261.4% | +2.4% |
| 1Y | -2.8% | +209.2% | -212.0% | -3.2% |
| 3Y | +37.9% | +208.4% | -170.5% | +34.6% |
| All | +37.9% | +206.1% | -168.2% | +34.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling