+300.3%
CMG vs GLDM
+248.1%
+52.1%
-58.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.9% | -0.7% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -0.5% | -2.3% | -2.7% |
| 30D | +7.1% | +4.4% | +2.7% | +6.5% |
| 3M | +31.2% | -1.1% | +32.2% | +31.1% |
| 6M | +0.7% | -13.7% | +14.3% | +2.5% |
| YTD | -0.1% | +2.8% | -2.9% | -1.1% |
| 1Y | -10.7% | +24.8% | -35.6% | -14.4% |
| 3Y | -4.7% | +127.8% | -132.5% | -20.3% |
| 5Y | -3.8% | +141.1% | -144.9% | -21.8% |
| All | +300.3% | +248.1% | +52.1% | +254.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling