-18.0%
CMG vs ALHC
+22.7%
-40.6%
-59.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.9% | +2.2% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +2.5% | +0.3% | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +15.6% | -10.6% | +26.2% | +16.7% |
| 3M | +8.2% | -45.3% | +53.5% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +9.9% | -59.7% | +69.6% | +18.6% |
| YTD | -4.6% | -62.7% | +58.1% | +3.2% |
| 1Y | +12.4% | -56.1% | +68.5% | +20.4% |
| 3Y | -18.0% | +21.3% | -39.2% | -14.0% |
| All | -18.0% | +22.7% | -40.6% | -14.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling