-29.4%
CMCSA vs LDOS
+35.4%
-64.8%
-47.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +12.0% | -3.7% | +15.7% | +12.6% |
| 30D | +17.5% | +16.4% | +1.1% | +15.0% |
| 3M | +2.4% | +7.4% | -5.0% | +1.2% |
| 6M | -2.9% | -0.3% | -2.6% | -3.5% |
| YTD | -6.2% | -24.0% | +17.9% | -4.7% |
| 1Y | +0.4% | -29.6% | +30.0% | +3.0% |
| All | -29.4% | +35.4% | -64.8% | -38.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling