-90.9%
CLSX vs VOO
+15.7%
-106.6%
-98.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.6% | -0.4% | -4.2% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +14.5% | +2.6% | +12.0% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -56.3% | -2.0% | -54.3% | -45.2% |
| 3M | -75.7% | -2.8% | -73.0% | -66.6% |
| 6M | -85.9% | +2.2% | -88.1% | -86.0% |
| YTD | -83.5% | +11.5% | -95.0% | -90.0% |
| 1Y | -90.1% | +13.5% | -103.6% | -94.6% |
| All | -90.9% | +15.7% | -106.6% | -95.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling