+205.5%
CLSK vs ZETA
+274.1%
-68.6%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +0.5% | -4.1% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -6.5% | +8.2% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +11.1% | +4.8% | +6.3% | +8.3% |
| 3M | -14.1% | +53.3% | -67.4% | -30.5% |
| 6M | +32.9% | +66.8% | -33.9% | +1.5% |
| YTD | +26.5% | +50.2% | -23.7% | -0.3% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | +62.0% | -34.4% | -3.8% |
| All | +205.5% | +274.1% | -68.6% | +28.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling