-58.1%
CLSK vs ZETA
+84.8%
-142.8%
-63.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.6% | +2.6% | -19.2% | -17.3% |
| 7D | -20.7% | -5.0% | -15.8% | -19.6% |
| 30D | -45.5% | -3.3% | -42.2% | -44.9% |
| 3M | -52.0% | +31.0% | -83.0% | -56.0% |
| 6M | -47.0% | +72.2% | -119.1% | -57.1% |
| YTD | -32.8% | +56.2% | -89.0% | -47.0% |
| 1Y | -58.1% | +90.3% | -148.4% | -70.0% |
| All | -58.1% | +84.8% | -142.8% | -70.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling