+32.9%
CLSK vs ZCMD
-99.4%
+132.4%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -1.7% | -1.9% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -2.0% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +11.1% | -19.8% | +30.9% | +11.6% |
| 3M | -14.1% | -62.1% | +48.0% | -14.8% |
| 6M | +32.9% | -99.5% | +132.4% | +41.8% |
| All | +32.9% | -99.4% | +132.4% | +41.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling