+226.3%
CLSK vs NVT
+190.9%
+35.4%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.8% | +4.6% | +2.2% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +7.7% | +4.1% | +3.7% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +12.2% | -5.1% | +17.4% | +17.6% |
| 3M | -15.5% | -1.2% | -14.3% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +39.3% | +46.6% | -7.2% | -2.1% |
| YTD | +35.1% | +60.0% | -24.9% | -12.0% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +70.8% | -36.8% | -17.2% |
| 3Y | +226.3% | +187.5% | +38.7% | +30.5% |
| All | +226.3% | +190.9% | +35.4% | +30.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling