+226.3%
CLSK vs LNT
+46.9%
+179.3%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.8% | 0.0% | +6.8% | +6.8% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -1.0% | +8.8% | +8.3% |
| 30D | +12.2% | -4.2% | +16.5% | +14.6% |
| 3M | -15.5% | -6.7% | -8.8% | -13.5% |
| 6M | +39.3% | -3.6% | +42.9% | +39.1% |
| YTD | +35.1% | +5.9% | +29.2% | +26.9% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | +7.3% | +26.8% | +25.9% |
| 3Y | +226.3% | +46.5% | +179.8% | +132.4% |
| All | +226.3% | +46.9% | +179.3% | +132.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling