+216.9%
CLSK vs LII
-1.0%
+217.9%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -2.4% | +1.0% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +17.2% | +0.5% | +16.7% | +16.9% |
| 30D | +14.6% | -11.2% | +25.8% | +23.5% |
| 3M | -16.8% | -28.8% | +12.0% | +1.8% |
| 6M | +38.2% | -26.9% | +65.1% | +64.2% |
| YTD | +31.2% | -22.2% | +53.4% | +46.8% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -32.0% | +69.3% | +70.9% |
| All | +216.9% | -1.0% | +217.9% | +213.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling