+181.4%
CLSK vs LDOS
+42.3%
+139.1%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +8.8% | -5.4% | +14.2% | +12.0% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +4.9% | -10.9% | -10.0% |
| 3M | -24.4% | +7.2% | -31.6% | -29.2% |
| 6M | +19.0% | -24.2% | +43.3% | +44.2% |
| YTD | +25.4% | -25.8% | +51.2% | +53.6% |
| 1Y | +39.8% | -24.7% | +64.5% | +70.9% |
| All | +181.4% | +42.3% | +139.1% | +140.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling