+216.9%
CLSK vs LCID
-92.8%
+309.7%
-71.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -7.8% | +6.3% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +17.2% | -9.3% | +26.6% | +21.3% |
| 30D | +14.6% | -35.4% | +50.0% | +34.0% |
| 3M | -16.8% | -17.1% | +0.2% | -17.7% |
| 6M | +38.2% | -58.9% | +97.1% | +80.5% |
| YTD | +31.2% | -59.6% | +90.8% | +73.5% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -78.0% | +115.3% | +129.8% |
| All | +216.9% | -92.8% | +309.7% | +686.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling