-67.9%
CLSK vs GLDM
+107.1%
-174.9%
-91.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | +0.1% | -2.9% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +8.0% | -4.6% | +12.6% | +11.8% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -5.5% | -22.5% | -25.2% |
| 3M | -42.3% | -10.9% | -31.4% | -37.0% |
| 6M | -50.0% | -17.3% | -32.7% | -42.7% |
| YTD | -34.3% | -10.2% | -24.1% | -27.1% |
| 1Y | -44.5% | -6.9% | -37.6% | -39.5% |
| 3Y | +74.5% | +98.7% | -24.1% | +7.8% |
| All | -67.9% | +107.1% | -174.9% | -83.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling