+38.2%
CLSK vs EWT
+62.7%
-24.5%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EWT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | +0.2% | -1.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +17.2% | +2.1% | +15.1% | +14.2% |
| 30D | +14.6% | +9.4% | +5.2% | +2.5% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +10.9% | -27.7% | -28.7% |
| 6M | +38.2% | +57.9% | -19.8% | -29.6% |
| All | +38.2% | +62.7% | -24.5% | -29.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EWT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EWT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EWT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EWT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling