+39.3%
CLSK vs CHYM
+48.2%
-8.8%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CHYM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.8% | +1.0% | +5.8% | +6.6% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -2.3% | +10.0% | +8.1% |
| 30D | +12.2% | +4.4% | +7.8% | +11.1% |
| 3M | -15.5% | +91.3% | -106.8% | -33.6% |
| 6M | +39.3% | +44.0% | -4.6% | +24.2% |
| All | +39.3% | +48.2% | -8.8% | +24.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CHYM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CHYM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CHYM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CHYM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling