+39.3%
CLSK vs AZO
-22.4%
+61.7%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.8% | -0.2% | +7.0% | +6.7% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -3.6% | +11.3% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +12.2% | -5.6% | +17.8% | +9.1% |
| 3M | -15.5% | -6.6% | -8.8% | -17.3% |
| 6M | +39.3% | -22.5% | +61.9% | +59.2% |
| All | +39.3% | -22.4% | +61.7% | +59.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling