+36.7%
CLS vs ZTS
-50.7%
+87.3%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.3% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +20.1% | -3.8% | +23.9% | +19.9% |
| 30D | +6.0% | -2.0% | +8.1% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -10.3% | -10.2% | -0.1% | -9.2% |
| 6M | +24.5% | -39.4% | +63.9% | +36.3% |
| YTD | +12.9% | -40.8% | +53.7% | +24.1% |
| 1Y | +36.7% | -50.1% | +86.8% | +54.0% |
| All | +36.7% | -50.7% | +87.3% | +54.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling