-32.5%
CLS vs ZTS
-29.5%
-3.0%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -0.6% | -13.2% | -13.5% |
| 30D | -38.2% | +11.0% | -49.2% | -36.5% |
| 3M | -28.8% | +10.9% | -39.8% | -26.7% |
| 6M | -40.4% | +0.9% | -41.3% | -37.5% |
| YTD | -24.3% | -33.0% | +8.7% | -13.2% |
| All | -32.5% | -29.5% | -3.0% | -23.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling