-26.6%
CLS vs ZM
-4.1%
-22.5%
-34.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +3.3% | -2.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +2.9% | +1.6% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -13.9% | +0.7% | -14.6% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -26.6% | -3.7% | -22.9% | -24.2% |
| All | -26.6% | -4.1% | -22.5% | -24.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling