-50.1%
CLS vs Z
-34.5%
-15.6%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | Z | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -2.4% | +2.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -22.2% | -4.6% | -17.6% | -21.7% |
| 30D | -44.4% | +8.3% | -52.7% | -43.6% |
| 3M | -34.3% | -11.6% | -22.7% | -34.1% |
| 6M | -50.1% | -33.6% | -16.4% | -34.0% |
| All | -50.1% | -34.5% | -15.6% | -34.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside Z.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus Z return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × Z return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded Z wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling