-35.5%
CLS vs UMC
+0.6%
-36.1%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -2.3% | -3.1% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +16.3% | +11.2% | +5.1% | +10.4% |
| 30D | -25.7% | -28.0% | +2.4% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -30.9% | -20.5% | -10.3% | -23.0% |
| 6M | -35.5% | -1.6% | -33.9% | -32.7% |
| All | -35.5% | +0.6% | -36.1% | -32.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling