-29.6%
CLS vs UMC
+112.5%
-142.1%
-50.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.1% | -2.1% | -7.0% | -8.2% |
| 7D | -21.1% | -14.7% | -6.5% | -15.7% |
| 30D | -38.2% | -32.9% | -5.4% | -27.3% |
| 3M | -36.3% | -22.2% | -14.2% | -29.5% |
| 6M | -43.8% | +25.9% | -69.7% | -47.9% |
| YTD | -20.0% | +107.9% | -127.9% | -41.8% |
| 1Y | -29.6% | +115.0% | -144.6% | -50.8% |
| All | -29.6% | +112.5% | -142.1% | -50.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling