+28.5%
CLS vs UMAC
+138.6%
-110.1%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -3.2% | +0.7% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -4.0% | +9.0% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +4.8% | -9.4% | +14.2% | +5.1% |
| 3M | -10.4% | +3.0% | -13.4% | -13.1% |
| 6M | +20.8% | +27.2% | -6.4% | +8.8% |
| YTD | +10.0% | +84.7% | -74.7% | -9.2% |
| 1Y | +28.5% | +136.5% | -108.0% | +1.6% |
| All | +28.5% | +138.6% | -110.1% | +1.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling