+1,249.5%
CLS vs LHX
+55.8%
+1,193.7%
-54.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LHX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.8% | -1.7% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -4.8% | +9.8% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +4.8% | -12.7% | +17.5% | +6.3% |
| 3M | -10.4% | -17.6% | +7.2% | -8.5% |
| 6M | +20.8% | -30.7% | +51.5% | +27.8% |
| YTD | +10.0% | -14.3% | +24.4% | +12.1% |
| 1Y | +28.5% | -8.4% | +36.9% | +29.8% |
| All | +1,249.5% | +55.8% | +1,193.7% | +1,178.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LHX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LHX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LHX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LHX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling