+848.2%
CLS vs FTNT
+154.0%
+694.2%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FTNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | +3.7% | +4.8% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -1.0% | +3.8% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -33.6% | +3.5% | -20.1% |
| 3M | -21.7% | -20.9% | -0.9% | -16.2% |
| 6M | -36.2% | +11.0% | -47.2% | -39.5% |
| YTD | -17.8% | +61.3% | -79.1% | -34.3% |
| 1Y | -26.8% | +53.1% | -79.9% | -40.0% |
| All | +848.2% | +154.0% | +694.2% | +612.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FTNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FTNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FTNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FTNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling