-35.3%
CLS vs FITB
+31.0%
-66.3%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.9% | +2.5% | +5.4% | +7.0% |
| 7D | -10.6% | -1.1% | -9.4% | -10.2% |
| 30D | -38.4% | +7.3% | -45.8% | -39.8% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -4.0% | -25.9% | -28.8% |
| 6M | -40.6% | +11.9% | -52.5% | -43.4% |
| YTD | -24.6% | +19.0% | -43.6% | -33.7% |
| All | -35.3% | +31.0% | -66.3% | -46.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling