-43.3%
CLS vs EPAM
+47.9%
-91.2%
-47.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -13.0% | +20.6% | -33.6% | -8.5% |
| 7D | -27.3% | +23.0% | -50.3% | -23.8% |
| 30D | -47.0% | +51.6% | -98.6% | -46.7% |
| 3M | -43.3% | +50.8% | -94.1% | -44.5% |
| All | -43.3% | +47.9% | -91.2% | -44.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling