-26.6%
CLS vs ECHO
-24.9%
-1.7%
-34.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +3.4% | +1.2% | +2.2% |
| 30D | -13.9% | +2.4% | -16.3% | -14.9% |
| 3M | -26.6% | -28.0% | +1.4% | -19.4% |
| All | -26.6% | -24.9% | -1.7% | -19.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling