-35.3%
CLS vs DXCM
+47.0%
-82.3%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | DXCM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.9% | +2.1% | +5.8% | +7.8% |
| 7D | -10.6% | -4.4% | -6.2% | -10.3% |
| 30D | -38.4% | -3.6% | -34.8% | -38.2% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -4.3% | -25.5% | -29.7% |
| 6M | -40.6% | +33.8% | -74.4% | -45.5% |
| YTD | -24.6% | +22.1% | -46.7% | -29.1% |
| All | -35.3% | +47.0% | -82.3% | -40.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DXCM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DXCM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DXCM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DXCM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling