-17.9%
CLS vs CSGP
-54.8%
+36.9%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CSGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | +2.9% | -8.2% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +16.3% | +1.3% | +14.9% | +16.8% |
| 30D | -25.7% | +2.8% | -28.5% | -24.2% |
| 3M | -30.9% | -6.3% | -24.5% | -30.3% |
| 6M | -35.5% | -3.2% | -32.3% | -33.7% |
| YTD | -18.7% | -54.0% | +35.3% | -18.3% |
| 1Y | -17.9% | -54.8% | +36.9% | -17.5% |
| All | -17.9% | -54.8% | +36.9% | -17.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CSGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CSGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CSGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CSGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling