+41.0%
CLS vs AZO
-32.5%
+73.6%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.6% | -0.2% | +6.7% | +6.5% |
| 7D | +10.9% | -3.6% | +14.5% | +10.4% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -5.6% | +7.6% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -6.6% | -3.5% | -10.6% |
| 6M | +30.4% | -22.5% | +52.9% | +27.3% |
| YTD | +17.2% | -15.2% | +32.4% | +19.5% |
| 1Y | +41.0% | -33.9% | +75.0% | +17.2% |
| All | +41.0% | -32.5% | +73.6% | +17.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling