-36.2%
CLS vs APTV
-31.0%
-5.2%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.5% | -0.4% | +8.9% | +8.7% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -8.9% | +11.7% | +6.7% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -9.5% | -20.6% | -27.4% |
| 3M | -21.7% | -20.6% | -1.2% | -14.4% |
| 6M | -36.2% | -28.9% | -7.4% | -30.4% |
| All | -36.2% | -31.0% | -5.2% | -30.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling