+54.8%
CLF vs GLDM
+248.1%
-193.4%
-82.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -0.9% | +2.7% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -0.5% | +8.1% | +7.8% |
| 30D | -1.2% | +4.4% | -5.6% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -13.4% | -1.1% | -12.3% | -13.1% |
| 6M | +15.4% | -13.7% | +29.1% | +22.6% |
| YTD | -5.9% | +2.8% | -8.6% | -7.5% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | +24.8% | -6.0% | +10.2% |
| 3Y | -19.4% | +127.8% | -147.2% | -38.3% |
| 5Y | -47.7% | +141.1% | -188.9% | -61.5% |
| All | +54.8% | +248.1% | -193.4% | +21.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling