+15.4%
CLF vs APTV
-33.5%
+49.0%
-39.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +3.1% | -1.3% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +6.6% |
| 30D | -1.2% | +2.0% | -3.2% | -1.5% |
| 3M | -13.4% | -34.2% | +20.9% | -0.8% |
| 6M | +15.4% | -34.7% | +50.1% | +29.4% |
| All | +15.4% | -33.5% | +49.0% | +29.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling