-35.1%
CLF vs AMC
-72.0%
+36.9%
-74.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.2% | -12.5% | +0.3% | -11.0% |
| 7D | -21.0% | 0.0% | -21.0% | -20.9% |
| 30D | -8.0% | +4.4% | -12.4% | -8.3% |
| 3M | -10.9% | +15.4% | -26.3% | -12.5% |
| 6M | +5.8% | +93.7% | -87.9% | -3.4% |
| YTD | -15.1% | +97.4% | -112.6% | -23.1% |
| 1Y | +7.2% | +23.2% | -16.0% | +0.8% |
| All | -35.1% | -72.0% | +36.9% | -28.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling