+30.9%
CL vs EPAM
-54.6%
+85.4%
-29.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -2.4% | +0.9% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -2.2% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -4.8% | +6.5% | -11.4% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +4.9% | +19.9% | -15.0% | +4.1% |
| 6M | -5.7% | -16.9% | +11.2% | -6.0% |
| YTD | +14.4% | -42.9% | +57.3% | +14.5% |
| 1Y | +8.7% | -30.4% | +39.1% | +8.4% |
| All | +30.9% | -54.6% | +85.4% | +30.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling