-14.1%
CI vs UMAC
+549.5%
-563.6%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +9.3% | -11.2% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +14.7% | -16.7% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -0.5% | -1.3% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -4.2% | +0.5% | -4.7% | -4.4% |
| 6M | +2.7% | +57.9% | -55.2% | +1.5% |
| YTD | +1.9% | +103.9% | -102.0% | +0.2% |
| 1Y | -6.3% | +159.3% | -165.5% | -8.4% |
| All | -14.1% | +549.5% | -563.6% | -21.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling