+51.9%
CI vs GTLB
-47.1%
+99.0%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | +1.1% | -2.4% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +11.1% | -9.7% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +37.8% | -33.4% | +3.7% |
| 3M | +0.7% | +61.6% | -60.9% | -0.4% |
| 6M | +0.3% | +98.9% | -98.6% | -1.2% |
| YTD | +3.8% | +32.8% | -29.0% | +3.1% |
| 1Y | -5.5% | +14.7% | -20.2% | -5.8% |
| 3Y | +8.1% | +1.3% | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| All | +51.9% | -47.1% | +99.0% | +48.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling