+92.9%
CHYM vs NIO
-52.4%
+145.3%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -4.9% | +6.5% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -14.5% | +21.5% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +15.7% | -15.0% | +30.6% | +19.0% |
| 3M | +4.3% | -35.6% | +39.8% | +11.4% |
| 6M | +92.9% | -55.7% | +148.6% | +117.9% |
| All | +92.9% | -52.4% | +145.3% | +117.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling